What is it particularly suitable for

1. Choices between different options
2. Preparation of decisions
3. Creating mood images
4. prioritization

Why we love it

1. Usually, when choosing between decision options, only the votes for the respective favourites are identified. Systemic consensus building makes visible a side that is often neglected, namely the resistance to the options.
2. Systemic consensus is a very practical method: it is fast, surprisingly simple and automatically delivers a solution. Another great advantage is that all participants are involved in the creative solution search and decision-making process. Especially when serious objections are raised, consideration is given to how the proposed solution can be improved so that the resistance can dissipate.
3. A consensual proposal is usually more easily received than the result of an approval poll (where there are winners and losers).

Procedure

1. The group develops as many proposed solutions as possible. If it fits, one solution should be in the selection "everything remains as it is" (so-called "zero solution"), because this can be the one that generates the least resistance among all solutions in the end.
2. The evaluation of the options is done silently by all group members. Everyone checks how high their objection to each proposal is. The scale ranges from zero (I have no objections) to ten (this proposal is unacceptable to me). Intermediate values are assigned according to feeling. Reasons for disagreement are subjective depending on individual needs, fears, or other resistance.
3. The resistances are queried proposal by proposal and added together. The total value is the group resistance of a proposal. The proposal with the lowest group resistance comes closest to consensus. It generates the least potential for conflict in the group and is considered "consensus".
4. Resistors with values of, for example, eight and higher should be listened to. If the reasons for the high resistance value are known, the proposal can possibly be creatively improved by the entire group. It is not uncommon for this to result in a solution proposal that may even be the best in the end.

Insider tips or "this is what we think is important".

1. What is really important is to listen to strong objections. Only then can the method develop its full effect.
2. The method cannot be used if the interests of the groups involved are completely divergent.
3. A classic consent survey also shows how motivated the participants are for a solution. In systemic consensus building, on the other hand, this is not evident. It only shows resistance. The information about motivation is relevant if the group is to commit to the solution afterwards. Therefore, you should weigh up when you need which method.
4. Before asking for the resistances, you can also ask for the participants' favourite options (e.g. classically by sticking dots). You can then combine the "positive votes" with the group resistance and determine the common favourite on this basis.

Attitude

An essential core of systemic consensus is the appreciative handling of resistances, which are normally evaluated as disturbing and counterproductive. In this method, all individual requirements, fears or other resistances are treated in a friendly-open and interested manner. Resistances are the fodder for more appropriate solutions.

By the way: For a better readability we change the gender form per method.